UK urged to ditch green plans and start fracking as energy bills soar: ‘Why bother?’ | Science | New

Dan Wootton criticizes Net Zero plans on GB News

As the cost of living nightmare sends shockwaves across the country as millions of households face fuel poverty due to rising gas bills, Westminster is scrambling to find ways to avoid the crisis. Critics of Net Zero, the policy that aims to take the UK completely off fossil fuels by 2050, say the UK is shooting itself in the foot by blocking access to its own cheap grid. energy Provisions.

When CAR26 director Lois Perry was asked ‘why are we bothering’ with net zero on GB News, she replied: ‘We shouldn’t be.

“The public doesn’t want it. Conservative voters don’t want it – according to our polls, 70% don’t want it.

“Nobody wants it. The times, the atmosphere, changed. There’s a zeitgeist… people are questioning the science now and they see that it’s really fishy and people aren’t willing to pay for it.

She later added, “We are quite capable of having home energy security, and really, really quickly.

“We can do fracking in 12 to 18 months. And we have many other things we can do. There is coal, there is oil from the North Sea. But we must not put ourselves in Germany’s position.

Lois Perry and Hydraulic Fracturing Infrastructure

Ms Perry said the UK should abandon net zero and start fracking (Image: Getty/GB News)

Energy bills

Energy bills soar for millions of homes (Picture: Express)

Hydraulic fracturing was banned in 2019 following the publication of scientific analyzes that exposed the risk of the shale gas extraction process – linking it to seismic activity.

While a petition calling on the government to end the ban has garnered nearly 20,000 signatures so far, the state still refuses to budge.

He responded to the petition in June: “The government does not agree with us lifting the pause on hydraulic fracturing at this time given the lack of compelling new evidence that shale gas extraction can be done safely.”

Many climate activists would also argue that any further gas extraction should not be allowed due to the urgency of the climate crisis.

For example, the UK is investing in Shell’s proposed Jackdaw oil field in the North Sea.

READ MORE: EU shoots itself in the foot as UK has ‘strong case’ for legal action


Activists urge government to stop Jackdaw from producing oil and gas (Image: Getty)

But activists have set up Stop Jackdaw, urging Shell to stop producing oil and gas at the site.

And it comes as the energy giant has raked in huge profits while Britons struggle to heat their homes due to soaring bills.

Lauren MacDonald, a climate campaigner with the group, said: “It is obscene that Shell can be allowed to make so much money when millions of families cannot afford to heat their homes. Benefits of this size, when so many families will suffer, means the system is broken.

“The only way to fix this is to move away from fossil fuels and invest in long-term solutions such as home insulation and cheaper renewable energy.”

She later added: “We can no longer rely on highly volatile and climate-devastating fossil fuels to provide a safe, secure and affordable energy supply to UK households.”

Octopus Energy and British Gas hand over major plan to UK to freeze bill [REPORT]
Octopus Energy gives lifeline to thousands of Britons [REVEAL]
Bulb fury: urgent demands to nationalize the energy supplier as a taxpayer [INSIGHT]

climate change

Governments around the world in a race to cut emissions (Picture: Express)

And while Ms Perry questioned the science behind net zero, an international panel of climate scientists warned in a damning report of a ‘code red’ for humanity in the face of climate change.

In the landmark IPCC study, experts warned that climate catastrophe can be avoided, but the world must act quickly.

That’s why governments around the world are racing to cut emissions, replacing fossil fuels like oil and gas with renewable technologies.

And Westminster’s climate advisers, the Climate Change Committee (CCC), stressed that “we need to act urgently across society and influence” the transition to a net zero economy.

But the green transition has required the closure of coal-fired power stations, the most polluting fossil fuel, as well as an agreement to decarbonize the North Sea oil and gas industry, which was reached in 2021.


Mr Johnson claimed the UK could boost its energy security through clean energy sources (Picture: Twitter)

This sparked fury among net zero critics like the Net Zero Scrutiny Group (NZSG).

This is the group of Conservative backbenchers calling for the strategy to be scrapped, which is part of Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s ten-point plan for a green industrial revolution.

NZSG Chairman Craig Mackinlay previously told The Times: “I am not a climate change denier. I fear our voters of the future will huddle around their heat-pump heaters and pay off debt on an electric vehicle they also never wanted as they gaze wistfully at China, Indonesia and more. other countries that still benefit from cheap energy from some of the dirtiest fossil fuels.

But even China has its own net zero targets, although it aims to cut all emissions 10 years later than Britain in 2060.

And while Ms Perry has claimed net zero undermines the UK’s chances of boosting its internal energy security, the Prime Minister begs to hold off, arguing it can be done using clean energy sources.

He tweeted earlier this week that “we need an affordable, clean and above all safe flow of energy” that is “made in Britain, for Britain”.

Mr Johnson added: “‘With energy cost spikes, household bills soaring, I know people across the country who will partly blame this great ambition for Net Zero, for the challenges of cost of living we face.

“And we have to be realistic, hydrocarbons will be an important part of our transition.

“But I want to tell you that the cost of not reaching Net Zero by 2050, the cost of not addressing climate change will be much, much higher.”

Source link

Denial of responsibility! is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Similar Articles

Most Popular